COCKYBOYS.COM ends 2012 with this hot sex scene Austin Wilde bottoms for Xtube star Bravo Delta.
Then on January 1st see Anthony Romero star in a sensational scene with Dale Cooper (The Haunting Part 2).
24 CommentsCategories: Paysite Spotlight
COCKYBOYS.COM ends 2012 with this hot sex scene Austin Wilde bottoms for Xtube star Bravo Delta.
Then on January 1st see Anthony Romero star in a sensational scene with Dale Cooper (The Haunting Part 2).
+ Bravo Delta Fucks Austin Wilde
jeremy says
that is great,i have been waiting for the scene.
jeremy says
i will love to see Bravo Delta bottom
James says
Wow, this might be what gets me to join CB. All the guys look SO good. Bravo is just perfection to me!
SirFucksAlot says
SO FUCKING HOT! I’m so happy to see Anthony Break out from Austin’s shadow! He is a wonderful and sexy performer.
Tony says
Austin Wilde is an attractive black man. I refer to him as black because of the one drop rule in the U.S. As a black man, I’ve never seen Austin have sex with a black man or Afro Latino. He seem to prefer white males and that’s his choice.
SuckItBaby says
Love to see Austin’s face as he is getting plowed yummm
sxg says
I always found Austin to be hot and a great top, but any time he bottoms all that hotness just elevates!
C says
Didn’t they already release “The Haunting 2” with Dale and Ricky Roman?
russell says
This is easily BD’s best video so far for Cocky Boys. He’s much more at ease and even believably passionate. Can’t wait to see him bottom (hopefully)!
IrishBoy says
@Russell – Bravo Delta IS straight, so I dunno. He’s sucking cock though, and it may be some sort of progression. If Rocco can do it, so can he I suppose!
cody says
@IrishBoy – The pics above prove that Bravo Delta ISN’T straight. He may want to think he’s straight, he may want you to think he’s straight, you may want to think he’s straight, but he’s not straight. The only way he’s “straight” is if we’re using such a broad definition of the word “straight” that it’s rendered meaningless. Only if we’re using a definition that isn’t used by the rest of the world or by any other actual straight men. Sure, he’s free to label himself however he wants. I could label myself as a purple tree. Then again, why would I? There’s no reward system but into being a purple tree. Unlike the reward system built into saying you’re “straight.”
joethehobo says
@cody
Alright, I’ll bite… What in the world makes you think you have more insight into the sexuality of someone you’ve seen on screen for maybe twenty minutes than he himself has? I hate to break it to you, as this may come as a bit of a shock, but there’s a lot of acting in porn. It’s almost as if porn is for the audience’s enjoyment and not the performer’s.
People on this site complain about gay4pay performers and their limp dicks killing our mood and the second a HOTTT, amateur straight guy gives his scene his all out of respect for his fans you attack his masculinity and sexuality. What a simple black and white world you must live in.
I guess what Mr. Delta can take from your comment is that he did a hell of a job fooling you into believing he was into the scene and he’s fine with that. Believe me, he’s laughing all the way to the bank.
cody says
@Joe – Ask any actual straight man in the world if they would (be able to) perform sex with another man, even if “acting.” Go ahead, go ask all the straight men you know. I’ll wait.
See…being “straight” means that you don’t have sex with other men, for any reason. For money, for fun, for acting. You aren’t ready, willing, or able. That is what the word “straight” means. Again, how do we know this? Ask straight men. Ask the majority of people. In fact, the only people in the world who thinks “gay4pay” guys are actually “straight” are either the gay4pay guys themselves or the viewers whose messed up fantasies gay4pay fulfills.
I don’t have to have insight into Bravo Delta’s sexuality to know the definitions of the words we use and the meaning they have in the world. Even if he is “acting,” he is choosing to put himself into the situation to act in the first place. He is choosing to star in gay porn, to have sex with men, to do something that isn’t straight. You know who chooses to do things that aren’t straight? People who aren’t straight. That doesn’t mean he’s gay – but he sure as hell isn’t straight. It’s no different than people who call themselves Christians yet act completely differently. They aren’t Christians, they simply call themselves that. It doesn’t require insight into their personal spirituality, it simply requires knowledge of what it means to be Christian and then an observation of their behavior.
Bravo Delta can laugh all the way to the bank all he wants. And everyone who knows him (personally or not) will laugh all the way to the circus every time he tries to convince himself or others that he is “straight” after he’s had sex with men. I’m sure EVERYONE believes him.
You see it as an attack on his “masculinity” and “sexuality” (as if not being straight means someone isn’t masculine – pathological much?) – I see it as him being so afraid of being labeled as anything but “straight” because he’s been taught that only real men are “straight.” He’s deluded himself into believing he’s straight to the point where he can have sex with men and think that it means nothing about his sexuality.
Unfortunately for him, straight men don’t willingly have sex with other men. How do we know this? Because that’s what makes them “straight.” If you want to live in a world with fluid sexuality and a Kinsey type scale then all you have to do is label people correctly (or encourage people to label themselves correctly). Maybe he’s bisexual. Maybe he’s heteroflexible. Whatever he is, he sure as hell ain’t “straight.”
cody says
Oh and how about you take it straight from Bravo Delta’s mouth (pun intended).
From his Twitter:
?”@bravodelta9 @Bkid1995 I don’t think I could exactly call myself 100% straight by definition.”
mm says
See, even “straight” BD doesn’t believe in G4P. lol
joethehobo says
@cody
I disagree with your assessment of what being straight means. You can still be straight and have gay sex for money. Being straight or gay emphasizes what sex you are attracted to. I myself am gay. The thought of having sex with a woman repulses me. Does that mean I’m a flamboyant queen, hell no. But the idea that just because this guy does a good job performing in front of a camera means he’s bisexual or gay is silly to me. The only person who knows the sexuality of Bravo Delta (I really wish this guy hadn’t picked such a stupid name as I feel really silly talking like this) is Bravo Delta.
We gay people face so much ignorance from the straight community pretending they know more about our sexuality than we do, so what in the world gives us the right to do the same thing to them? If Bravo Delta says he’s straight, then he’s straight. If you were paid $10,000 to lick a guy’s armpit you would be doing it for the money, not because you have an attraction to armpits.
mm says
joethebobo, are you blind? Even he says he is not straight! Why do you keep on insisting on it? Straight fetish too much? Because being gay or bisexual means “attack on masculinity”?
None of these men are straight. Get over it.
joethehobo says
@mm
Cody was suggesting that Bravo Delta wasn’t straight based on his performance, not what he said on twitter. If it somehow makes you guys feel better to feel like you’re watching a straight guy turn gay then more power to you, but just please stop taking it to the comments section like a gay witch hunt. If Bravo Delta says he’s is attracted to men, then he’s not straight. I’ll take his word for it, but you and I both know you made your judgment off of the scene and not this supposed tweet. Your suggestion that ‘none of these guys are straight’ is not only irrational, but naiive. Sorry if it’s a boner killer for you, but these guys in question are attracted to the money in front of them, not the dick.
cody says
No one is “watching a straight guy turn gay” because these guys aren’t straight to begin with. The reason g4p is such a huge thing is because so many pathological homos want to see a “straight guy turn gay.”
There’s no simpler way to put it – a “straight” guy does not choose to engage in sex with men for any reason whatsoever. That is what makes him “straight.” Does it mean a man is gay if he has sex with other men? No, but by definition he isn’t “straight” either.
You say you don’t agree with my assessment of what being straight means. It’s not an assessment or an opinion. That’s like disagreeing about what water is or what a tree is or what being gay is. Being straight means that one has no desire or willingness to engage in sex with other men. That’s not an “assessment” that’s the meaning of the word. (The socially accepted and agreed upon meaning of the word.)
Even if they are “acting” and only attracted to money, they are still choosing a profession where they are engaging in sex with men. They CHOOSE the profession. No “straight” man chooses to have sex with another man. Their very choice precludes them from being straight in the first place, I simply can’t see how hard that is to understand.
Bravo can call himself straight, you can call Bravo straight, Mahatma Gandhi can call Bravo straight, it doesn’t matter. If he doesn’t live up to the very, very, very widely definition of the word, then there’s nothing wrong with someone being like … hmmm, you know what, Bravo isn’t straight.
You’ll have people come in and be like “labels don’t mean anything” or “people should be able to label themselves whatever they want” or “sexuality is fluid.”
I won’t argue with any of that. Except that these pornstars (or their studios) and then the blogs, are the ones who are labeling these guys as “straight.”
If they labeled these guys a bunny rabbits and a bunch of people were like ummmm they aren’t bunny rabbits would you be coming in here saying “wait a minute, Bravo really is a bunny rabbit damnit!”
Go ask 1000 people what a bunny rabbit is. Now go ask 1000 people what being straight is.
See if Bravo Delta is either of those things.
mm says
very well said, cody
joethehobo says
I guess we’ll just agree to disagree. I think attraction and action are two very different things. Being straight means you are attracted to members of the opposite sex. If you are offered money to do a scene with another member of the same sex, that has nothing to do with who you are attracted to. Your argument isn’t as sound as agreeing on what water is and you’re delusional to presume so.
I’m 100% gay; I am not attracted to women at all, but in the unlikely event that I was offered a million dollars to sleep with a woman, then I’m pretty sure I’d do it. It doesn’t make me any less gay, it just means I like money.
joethehobo says
To put it simply, it’s like me and my distaste for broccoli. I hate the stuff, but if someone paid me thousands of dollars to eat a plate of broccoli for THEIR enjoyment, I’d do it. Does this mean I now like broccoli? No. I think if Bravo Delta was having sex with guys on HIS own time and for HIS enjoyment then you could probably assess that he is not straight. But your initial comment stated that you could tell Mr. Bravo wasn’t straight from the pictures alone, not any tweets or other references concerning the subject.
I appreciate your keeping a level head and not just lashing out at me from the get go. It’s nice having a civil argument with someone even if it is on a gay porn blog comments section. (Oh god, have I hit a new low?)
mm says
joethehobo, you obviously never had sex with a “straight” guy, and don’t know how a closet works for them. And no, i didn’t pay any money. It was “gay-for-no-pay”.
Caius_Cilius says
Whether Bravo is straight (which I doubt) or not, I still need to see his hunky ass plugged by another guy, preferrably Dillon Rossi.